The atheistic evolutionist W

Carbon dating method accuracy

Other radiometric dating methods There are various other radiometric dating methods used today to give ages of millions or billions of years for rocks. That is, they take up less than would be expected and so they test older than they really are. In order for carbon dating to by accurate certain foundational assumptions must first be true. Rapid reversals during the flood year and fluctuations shortly after would have caused the field energy to drop even faster.

It is necessary that the dating sample be as uncontaminated as possible, to give it an accurate age. Again, this indicates a maximum age, not the actual age. The more accurate carbon clock should yield better dates for any overlap of humans and Neanderthals, as well as for determining how climate changes influenced the extinction of Neanderthals.

However this problem is

In summary, the carbon method, when corrected for the effects of the flood, can give useful results, but needs to be applied carefully. Numerous models, or stories, have been developed to explain such data. We must also assume to know what the ratio of carbon to carbon was in the environment in which our specimen lived during its lifetime. When the isotope concentrations are adjusted for such conversions, the ages calculated are reduced from some Ma to recent.

The strength of the

However, this problem is taken care of, by calibration curves, which account for the change in the ratio. The strength of the Earth's magnetic field affects the amount of cosmic rays entering the atmosphere.

They use tree rings as the calibration standard. Gentry has addressed all attempts to criticize his work.

It makes no sense at all if man appeared at the end of billions of years. It is very much driven by the existing long-age world view that pervades academia today. This is only because it is well calibrated with objects of known age. Scientists do not measure the age of rocks, they measure isotope concentrations, and these can be measured extremely accurately. In order to improve the accuracy of carbon dating, we must look at why these assumptions are questionable and how we can compensate for the uncertainties raised by our doubts.